Ajit Kumar Dinesh Kumar Singh v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application adjourned at counsel's request; State, on instructions from the investigating officer, undertook not to arrest the applicant till the next date subject to attendance at the police station as directed.
What did the court decide?
Applicant directed to attend the concerned police station as and when required; no arrest undertaking till next date.
What the court decided
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SANJAY SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2024.12.19 21:52:35 +0530
Chitra Sonawane 5-ABA-2213-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No.2213 of 2024
Ajit Kumar Dinesh Kumar Singh …... Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra …... Respondent.
Mr Abner Gomes i/by Rex Legalis for the applicant. Mr Arfan Sait, APP for respondent/State. PSI SA More, Naupada Police station.
Coram : R.N.Laddha, J. Date : 19 December 2024.
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the applicant seeks an adjournment on the ground of unavailability of the arguing Counsel.
- Learned APP, on instructions from the investigating officer present in the Court, submits that the applicant has attended the concerned police station and cooperated with the investigation, and maintains his earlier statement that the applicant will not be arrested in the present crime till the next date, with a stipulation that, the applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when required.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ajit Kumar Dinesh Kumar Singh
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
R.N. Laddha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court