Vivek Ajaykumar Devani v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application adjourned because the investigating officer was absent; the State assured the applicant would not be arrested until the next hearing.
What the court decided
Mamta Kale
14-aba-2212-2024.docx
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.12.2014:26:43+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2212 of 2024
Vivek Ajaykumar Devani … Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents
Dr Abhinav Chandrachud i/b Mr Ratnish Dubey, for the applicant (through VC).
Mr Arfan Sait, APP, for the respondent/ State.
Mr Mubin Solkar a/w Mr Yusuf a/w Mr Anas Shaikh a/w Mr Tahir Hussain a/w Mehrosh Solkar, for respondent No.2. PSI Ramesh Jagtap, Kandivali Police Station, Mumbai, is present.
Coram: R.N. Laddha, J. Date: 20 December 2024
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vivek Ajaykumar Devani
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No.2 (complainant)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shraddha Mahendra Kale vs Mahendra Vasant Kale
Radhabai Madhukar Salunkhe vs Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Ashok S/O. Babasaheb Salgude and Ors. vs Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Limited, Thr.Divisional Controller Msrtc, Pune
National Insurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai vs Sultana Sultan Shaikh and Anr.