The applicant withdrew the anticipatory bail application on instructions. The Court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the application.
Leave to withdraw the application was granted; the application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SANJAY SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2024.08.05 19:55:23 +0530
Chitra Sonawane 8-ABA-2176-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No.2176 of 2024
... Pravin Popat Jadhav Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent.
Mr Aditya Sharma for the applicant. Mr Amit A Palkar, APP for the State.
Coram : R.N.Laddha, J. Date : 5 August 2024. ---
P.C. :
After hearing the matter for some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant the relief, learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application. Leave granted as prayed for. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
[ R. N. Laddha,J. ]
Page No. 1 of 1 ____________________________________________ 5 August 2024.
Pravin Popat Jadhav
State of Maharashtra
R.N.Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
