Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous after counsel jointly informed the court that the underlying FIR had been quashed by a Division Bench of the High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by SMITA SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVES GONSALVES Date: 2024.08.08 10:28:10+0530
938.aba1281-24.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1281 OF 2024
... Ranjan Rupasi Nisar Applicant v/s. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr Jenish D Jain, for the Applicant.
Mr Amit A Palkar, APP, for Respondent State.
Coram : R.N. Laddha, J.
Date : 7 August 2024
P.C. :
. The learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP jointly inform the Court that the present FIR has been quashed by a Division Bench of this Court by an order dated 1 August 2024 and therefore, the present application becomes infructuous. In view of this, the application stands dismissed as infructuous.
Page 1 of 1 _______________________________________________ 15 July 2024
Ranjan Rupasi Nisar
State of Maharashtra
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
