Applicant sought anticipatory bail but, on instructions, counsel sought leave to withdraw the application. Leave was granted and the application was dismissed as withdrawn. No merits were decided.
Leave to withdraw the anticipatory bail application; dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA JOHNSONGONSALVES Digitally signed by SMITAJOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2024.09.03 14:25:22+0530
6.aba1875-24.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1875 OF 2024
... Jignesh Bharatbhai Shah Applicant v/s. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr Shantanu Kadam, i/b. Gaurav Parkar, for the Applicant.
Mr Arfan Sait, APP, for Respondent State.
PSI Krishna Khot, Bandra Police Station, is present.
Coram : R.N. Laddha, J.
Date : 3 September 2024
P.C. :
. Heard.
Page 1 of 1
3 September 2024
Jignesh Bharatbhai Shah
State of Maharashtra
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
