Akbarali Akramal Syed v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application adjourned by consent; first informant added as party respondent, replies to be filed, applicant to attend police station and co-operate with investigation, interim protection continued till next date.
What did the court decide?
Interim protection granted earlier continued till next date.
What the court decided
SMITAJOHNSON Digitally signed bySMITA JOHNSONGONSALVESDate: 2024.07.10 GONSALVES 16:41:03 +0530
31.aba1799-24.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1799 OF 2024
... Akbarali Akramal Syed Applicant v/s.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr Vishal M Deshmukh,a/w. Mr Vipul, for the Applicant.
Mr Nitin B Patil, APP, for Respondent State.
Ms Trupti Khamkar, for Respondent No.2/Original Complainant.
API Pratibha Patil from MIDC Police Station, present.
Coram : R.N. Laddha, J.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Akbarali Akramal Syed
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
R.N. Laddha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court