The applicant sought leave to withdraw an anticipatory bail application. The Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITAJOHNSON Digitally signed by SMITAJOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2024.06.25 GONSALVES 18:12:25 +0530
905.aba1694-24.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1694 OF 2024
Himalay Maruti Devkate ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Mr Shahed Ali Ansari, for the Applicant.
Ms Rashmi Tendulkar, APP for the Respondent – State.
Coram : R. N. Laddha, J.
Date : 25 June 2024
P.C.:
. After hearing the matter for some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant relief, the learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application. Leave granted as prayed for.
page 1 of 1
Himalay Maruti Devkate
The State of Maharashtra
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
