Anticipatory bail application; after hearing, the court was not inclined to grant relief and counsel sought leave to withdraw the application on instructions. Leave was granted and the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
23-aba-1650-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1650 OF 2024
Raza Abbas Rizvi ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Mr. Wasim Farooq Prandarwala, for the Applicant. Mr. C. D. Mali, APP for the Respondent – State. PSI Karamunge M. V., Kalyan Police Station present.
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 1 JULY 2024
P.C.
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.07.0116:07:56+0530
. After hearing the matter for some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant the relief, the learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application. Leave granted as prayed for.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
page 1 of 1
Raza Abbas Rizvi
The State of Maharashtra
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
