Vijay Patiram Yadav v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application adjourned to 1 August 2024 as counsel could not furnish a copy of the application to the Registry for notice to respondent No.2. Any interim protection earlier granted was directed to continue until the next date.
What the court decided
Mamta Kale
27-aba-1569-2024.doc
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.07.1615:39:24+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1569 of 2024
Vijay Patiram Yadav ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Siddharth Singh i/b. Mr. Manoj Singh a/w. Mr. Dinesh Yadav, for the Applicant.
Mr. Amit A. Palkar, APP for the Respondent – State. PSI (Pairvai) S. R. Salunkhe, Kurar Police Station, Mumbai present.
Coram : R. N. Laddha, J.
Date : 15 July 2024
P.C.
. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to some unavoidable circumstances, he could not provide the copy of this application to the Registry to enable it to issue notice to the respondent No.2. He states that during the course of the day, he will provide copy of the application to the Registry. At his request, stand over to 1 August 2024.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vijay Patiram Yadav
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
R. N. Laddha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court