This brief order dismisses an anticipatory bail application, noting that a coordinate bench had already disposed of the applicant’s earlier application on the same matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
903-aba-1540-2024.doc
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.06.1115:54:33+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1540 OF 2024
Prafull Kumar Rajeshbhai Makwana ..Applicant Vs. XYZ & Anr. ..Respondents
Ms. Anju Agarwal, for the Applicant. Ms. Rashmi Tendulkar, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 11 JUNE 2024
P.C.
. The learned counsel for the applicant points out that the Coordinate Bench (Coram : Bharati Dangre, J.) had disposed of the applicant’s earlier anticipatory bail application, therefore matter would lie before the same learned Judge.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
page 1 of 1
Prafull Kumar Rajeshbhai Makwana
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
