applicant that the gift deed is forged and that he does not possess it. Moreover, the applicant did not rely on the purported gift deed at the time of registering his name with the Municipal Corporation. Instead, the copy of the gift deed submitted for record purposes was obtained by an application filed under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005. Its worth noting that the prosecution claims the gift deed is a notarised rather than registered document, rendering the production of a certified copy unnecessary. Further, based on the applicant’s complaint, an offence was registered against respondent no.2 and three others for fabricating documents, including the publication of notice, in connection with the present crime. Additionally, there are ongoing civil litigations between the parties related to the property in question. The prosecution does not assert that the applicant has no connection whatsoever, to this property, as it originally belonged to his father. Further, as per the prosection, the applicant has attended the police station as and when called. Also, the execution of the alleged gift deed itself is in dispute. Admittedly, the applicant has been under protection since the year 2018. Furthermore, the record reveals that in Writ Petition No.2817 of 2018, filed by the co-accused Rajvindar Singh Ajit Singh, seeking quashing, the investigation has concluded, and the charge sheet is being presented to the trial court.
