Allowed

Shahrukh Alias Nazem Sattar Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC12 Nov 2024ABA/1505/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application for offences under multiple sections of the BNS with a maximum sentence of three years. The court allowed bail on a PR bond of Rs.15,000 with sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation and non-tampering.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on PR bond Rs.15,000 with one or two sureties, with conditions to attend police station, not tamper with evidence or influence witnesses, and co-operate with investigation.

Shahrukh Alias Nazem Sattar Shaikh Vs the State of… — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AUG:26763

¶2

¶3

ABA1505.2024

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

923 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1505 OF 2024

¶6

. Shahrukh @ Nazem Sattar Shaikh .. Applicant

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

¶9

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Jadhav Arvind Gangadhar APP for Respondent/State: Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya

¶10

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 12.11.2024

¶11

P.C. :

¶12

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

¶13

2] The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.434 of 2024, registered at Vasmat Shahar Police Station, District Hingoli, for the offences punishable under Sections 118, 125, 125(b), 118(1), 189(2), 189(4), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the BNS.

¶14

3] The offence punishable is maximum of three years sentence.

¶15

¶16

ABA1505.2024

¶17

4] In view of the above, the application is allowed in the following terms :

¶18

i] In the event the applicant is arrested in connection with Crime No.434 of 2024, registered at Vasmat Shahar Police Station, District Hingoli, he shall be released on bail on furnishing PR bond of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

¶19

ii] The applicant shall attend the police station as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

¶20

iii] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

¶21

iv] The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court.

¶22

5] In the event, the applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶23

6] It is also clarified that the observations made in

¶24

¶25

ABA1505.2024

¶26

this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

¶27

7] The application stands disposed of.

¶28

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE

¶29

marathe

Shahrukh Alias Nazem Sattar Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shahrukh Alias Nazem Sattar Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balasaheb Dagadu Shete and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Mudssir Mubin Kureshi Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Akramkha Arshadkha Pathan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Mohanlal Pannalaji Jangada Vs Arvind Pannalalji Jangada and Others

Mohanlal Pannalaji Jangada Vs Arvind Pannalalji Jangada and Others

Sunil Manikrao Aaghav Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another