Anticipatory bail application disposed of after the State stated no offence was registered against the applicant and that 72 hours prior notice would be given before any arrest.
Application disposed of; State to give 72 hours prior notice before any arrest; liberty to file fresh anticipatory bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
18-aba-1464-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1464 OF 2024
Kedar Sudhakar Satam ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Mr. Sanjeev Kadam a/w. Ms. Bharti Lokhande a/w. Mr. Raju Yamgar i/b. Mr. Prabhakar Jadhav, for the Applicant. Ms. Mahalaxmi Ganapathy, APP for the Respondent – State. API Bharti Dindoshi Police Station present.
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 24 JUNE 2024
P.C.
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.06.2416:13:42+0530
. Learned APP, on instructions of the Investigating Officer who is present before the Court, states that no offence has been registered against the applicant upto this point. Furthermore, if the investigating agency intends to arrest the applicant, they will give 72 hours prior notice to the applicant.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
page 1 of 1
Kedar Sudhakar Satam
The State of Maharashtra
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
