This court noted that the applicant had earlier withdrawn an anticipatory bail application heard by a coordinate bench and sought to file a fresh application before the same judge.
None granted in this order as the matter was disposed of by direction to verify facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
3-aba-1449-2024.doc
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.06.2018:14:30+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1449 OF 2024
Manish Raosaheb Shinde ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Mr. Rahul Shirsat i/b. Ms. Aparna Shinde, for the Applicant. Ms. Rajeshree Newton, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 20 JUNE 2024
P.C.
. The learned APP points out that the Coordinate Bench of this Court (Coram : Sarang V. Kotwal, J.) had already heard the applicant’s earlier anticipatory bail application and the same was withdrawn. In view of this, the matter would lie before the same learned Judge.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application filed before the same bench after withdrawal of the earlier one should be allowed in view of its coordination by the learned APP.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manish Raosaheb Shinde
The State of Maharashtra
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
