Kalavati Tukaram Patil and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application with intervenor's interim application stood over to a later date by consent; existing interim protection, if any, continued until the next date, with liberty to file reply affidavits.
What did the court decide?
Interim protection, if any, continued till next date; liberty to file reply affidavit.
What the court decided
Mamta Kale
19-aba-1394-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1394 of 2024
Kalavati Tukaram Patil and Ors. ...Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
With
Interim Application No. 2400 of 2024 in
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1394 of 2024
Ujwala Yashodhan Patil ...Applicant /
Intervenor
In the matter between
Kalavati Tukaram Patil and Ors. ...Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. D. S. Mhaispurkar a/w. Hrishikesh Pawaskar, for the Applicant. Mr. Yogesh Y. Dabake, APP for the Respondent – State. Mr. Kasim Sheikh a/w. Devidas Bhoir and Ashwini Mhatre, for the Intervenor.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Kalavati Tukaram Patil and Ors.
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- intervenor
Ujwala Yashodhan Patil
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court