The High Court of Bombay dismissed anticipatory bail applications. The court recorded the Investigating Officer's statement confirming no arrest was intended. The applicants were directed to attend the police station on Wednesdays and Thursdays for two weeks and cooperate with the investigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(16)-(17)-ABA-1390-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1390 OF 2024
Sangeeta Narendra Agrawal And Anr. ...Applicants Versus State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent
WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1391 OF 2024
Narendra Hariprasad Agrawal ...Applicant Versus State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Prem Tanna a/w Ms. Ritika Chamaria, Adv. Elton George, Mr. Sharad Rai and Mr. Shailendra Mishra i/by M/s. Shailendra Mishra & Associates Advocate for the Applicants.
Ms. Megha Bajoria, APP for the Respondent – State.
PSI, Lohokare, EOW, Mumbai.
P.C.:
Investigating Officer will not arrest the Applicants till the next date
of hearing subject to condition that they shall cooperate with the investigation. Statement is recorded and accepted.
1 of 2
V. A. Tikam
(16)-(17)-ABA-1390-2024.doc
(M.W. CHANDWANI, J.)
2 of 2
V. A. Tikam
Sangeeta Narendra Agrawal
Narendra Hariprasad Agrawal
State Of Maharashtra
M.W. CHANDWANI
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
