The High Court Bench at Aurangabad granted permission to the applicants to withdraw their anticipatory bail application. The application was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application was granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:4657
1 942-ABA-1366-23.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1366 OF 2023
SUNDAR VITTHAL @ VITHOBA SHINDE AND OTHERS VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Mr. Shashikant E. Shekade, Advocate for Applicants
Mr. D.B. Bhange, APP for Respondents/State
Mr. Bhimrao R. Rathod, Advocate h/f Mr. Sachin S. Bhise, Advocate for Assist to APP
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.
DATE : 05th MARCH, 2024
PER COURT :
withdrawn.
(NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Sundar Vitthal @ Vithoba Shinde and Others
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin B. Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
