The applicants sought leave to withdraw an anticipatory bail application. The court noted its previous disinclination to grant relief and allowed the withdrawal. The application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:26350
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1264 OF 2024
RAJIV NETAJI MORE AND ANOTHER VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Mr. M. S. Bhosale, Advocate for the applicants Mrs. M. L. Sangit, APP for the respondent/State Mr. S. G. Karlekar, Advocate for the informant
PER COURT :-
ssp
1 of 1
956.aba1264.24.odt
RAJIV NETAJI MORE AND ANOTHER
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
