Anticipatory bail application; applicants sought withdrawal on instructions after the Court showed disinclination to entertain it, and the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:26262
1125.24aba
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
955 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1125 OF 2024
Yogesh Manik Sarak And Another VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
Mr P. S. Chavan, Advocate for Applicants Mr P. K. Lakhotiya, A.P.P. for Respondents/State
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 23rd October, 2024
PER COURT :-
this application, learned counsel for applicants, on instructions,
seeks liberty to withdraw this application.
withdrawn on instructions.
(R. M. JOSHI) Judge
sjk
Yogesh Manik Sarak And Another
The State Of Maharashtra
R. M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
