Santosh Arjun Nage v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant moved to withdraw an anticipatory bail application, which was then dismissed as withdrawn. The court did not decide any substantive issues.
The applicant moved to withdraw an anticipatory bail application, which was then dismissed as withdrawn. The court did not decide any substantive issues.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15-aba-1177-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1177 OF 2024
Santosh Arjun Nage ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Chaitanya Pendse, i/b, Balwant Salunke, for the Applicant Mr. Prashant Jadhav, APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 2nd May, 2024
P.C.:
AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV
Digitally signed by AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV Date: 2024.05.04 13:07:21 +0530
leave to withdraw the application. Leave granted.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
Amol
...1
Santosh Arjun Nage
The State of Maharashtra
N. J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court