Disposed

Vaibhav Subhash Nalage v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC27 Jun 2024ABA/1107/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail sought in a cheating case over an alleged fake APMC tender investment scheme. The applicant had refunded the amount he personally received and works with the Police Department, so unlikely to abscond. The court granted ad-interim anticipatory bail till the next date.

What did the court decide?

Ad-interim release on bail on P.R. bond of ₹30,000/- with one or two sureties if arrested, order operative till 27 June 2024; applicant to attend police station as called.

Vaibhav Subhash Nalage vs State of Maharashtra — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2024)

901 ABA 1107 of 2024

1 of 4

Kishor

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1107 OF 2024

¶6

Vaibhav Subhash Nalage ..Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent

¶7

Mr. A. K. Chauhan, a/w. Mr. Rahul Chauhan & Ms. Vidya Rao, for Applicant.

¶8

Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, APP for State/Respondent.

¶9

CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 30 APRIL 2024

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

The Applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in connection

¶12

with C.R. No.573 of 2023 registered at Talegaon-Dabhade Police

¶13

Station, Pune under sections 420, 406 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Heard Mr. Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicant

¶15

and Smt. Mhatre, learned APP for the State.

¶16

The F. I. R. is lodged by one Uttam Mande. It is stated

¶17

that he is teaching in a high school at Nigde Tal. Maval. He had a friend named Mr. Atul Machale, who had brought the present

¶18

2 of 4 901 ABA 1107 of 2024

¶19

Applicant to the Informant’s house and introduced them with eachother. After some days the Applicant, who was a Police Naik told him that he was interested in getting work through tender with APMC, Gultekdi, Pune. The documentation was to be done by one Sujit Devkule. There was requirement of funds. The Applicant did not have that much amount. He requested for financial help from the informant. He promised ₹ 60,000/- per month to be paid to the informant if the informant invested with them. The Applicant told the informant that the requirement was of ₹ 12,25,000/- for the tender process and for documentation ₹ 75,000/- was to be paid to the Applicant. The F. I. R. mentions that the informant paid

¶20

₹ 75,000/- to the applicant and in all he paid ₹ 13,00,000/- as requested by the Applicant and others. Subsequently there was no news about that tender. The Applicant did not contact him. The informant’s money was lost. He also came to know that similar to him one Santosh Chavan had lost ₹ 6,50,000/-. On this basis the F.I.R. is lodged.

¶21

Learned counsel for Applicant submitted that even before lodging of F.I.R., amount of ₹ 75,000/- was refunded by the

¶22

3 of 4 901 ABA 1107 of 2024

¶23

Applicant to the informant. Learned APP, on instructions with the investigating officer accepts this fact. Learned counsel for Applicant therefore submitted that the Applicant has not benefited from this entire transaction. He has shown his bonafide by returning the money which he himself had received.

¶24

Learned APP submitted that the total amount lost by the informant was ₹ 13,00,000/-. The promise and inducement were made by the Applicant. Therefore, he is not responsible for the loss of ₹ 75,000/- alone.

¶25

I have considered these submissions. Since the

¶26

Applicant is working with the Police Department, he is not likely to abscond. He has refunded the amount which he himself had received. Therefore, as of today, the Applicant can be protected by way of an ad-interim order. The investigation can go on and the learned APP can make further submission on the basis of the result of the investigation. For that purpose Applicant will have to attend the concerned police station as and when called and will have to cooperate with the investigating agency.

901 ABA 1107 of 2024

4 of 4

Hence, the following order :

¶31

O R D E R

¶32

i) In the event of his arrest in connection with C. R. No.573 of 2023, registered at Talegaon Dabhade Police Station, till the next date the Applicant shall be released on bail on his executing P. R. bond in the sum of ₹ 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) with one or two sureties in the like amount.

¶33

ii) This order shall operate till 27^th June 2024.

¶34

iii) The Applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when called and shall cooperate with the investigating agency.

¶35

iv) Stand over to 27^th June 2024.

¶36

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

¶37

Digitally signed KISHOR by KISHORVISHNU VISHNU KAMBLE KAMBLE Date:2024.05.04 15:05:35 +0530

Vaibhav Subhash Nalage v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vaibhav Subhash Nalage v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Madhuvan Andheri Co-Operative Housing Society Limited vs the Competent Authority District Dy Registrar Co. Operative Society Mumbai 3

Sabari Basera Chs Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra and 29 Ors.

Bharat Vasant Kadekar vs State of Maharashtra

Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Satara and Ors. vs Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., Mumbai Thr Its Superintending Er and Anr.

Mrs. Dimple Parag Thakkar vs Mr. Parag Chandrakant Thakkar

Shri Mahadev Shankar Chopade vs Ramchandra Shankar Chopade