Disposed

Shradha Shipping Company Pvt. Ltd. Rep by Managing Director Chandrakant Gawas v. Ravindra Naidu

Bombay HC8 Feb 2024AAR/10/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court appointed N.A. Britto as sole arbitrator on mutual consent of applicant and respondent regarding a contractual dispute, fixing procedural fees and timeline.

What did the court decide?

N.A. Britto appointed as sole arbitrator; order to file disclosure statement and pay fees; seat fixed at Panaji.

What the court decided

Shradha Shipping Company Pvt. Ltd. Rep by Managing Director… — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

9 AAR-10-2023.DOC

¶2

Meena

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPLN. FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATION NO.10 OF 2023

¶4

Shradha Shipping Company Pvt. Ltd. Rep by … Applicant Managing Director Chandrakant Gawas.

¶5

v/s.

¶6

Ravindra Naidu …Respondent

¶7

Mr. Pritesh Majalikar, Advocate for the Applicant.

¶8

Ms. Prajyoti Paingankar, Advocate for the Respondent.

¶9

CORAM: BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J DATED: 8^th February, 2024

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

Heard Mr. Pritesh Majalikar, learned Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Prajyoti Paingankar, learned Counsel for the Respondent.

¶12

The learned Counsel appearing for the parties hands in minutes of appointment of arbitration by mutual consent. The learned Counsel submit that the parties are now ready to refer the dispute to the learned Arbitrator. In the minutes, the name of the learned Arbitrator is also submitted.

¶13

Accordingly, Jt. N.A. Britto, a Former Judge of this Court is appointed as sole Arbitrator on mutual consent by the parties.

¶14

Page 1 of 3 8^th February 2024

¶15

9 AAR-10-2023.DOC

¶16

In these circumstances, the following order is passed :-

¶17

a. Mr. N.A. Britto, a Former Judge of this Court, is appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to decide upon the disputes and differences between the Applicant and the Respondent.

¶18

b. A copy of this order will be communicated to the learned Sole Arbitrator by the Advocate for the Applicant within a period of one week from today.

¶19

c. The learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to forward his Statement of Disclosure under Section 11 (8) read with Section 12 (1) of the Arbitration Act to the Advocate for the Applicant so as to enable him to file the same in the Registry of this Court. The Registry of this Court shall retain the said Statement on the file of this Application and a copy of the same shall be furnished by the Advocates for the Applicant to the Advocates for the Respondent.

¶20

d. The parties shall appear before the learned Sole Arbitrator on such date and at such place as he nominates to obtain appropriate directions with regard to fixing a schedule for completing pleadings etc. The Arbitral Tribunal shall give all further directions with reference to the arbitration and also as to how it is to proceed.

¶21

e. Contact and communication particulars shall be provided by both sides to the learned Sole Arbitrator within a period of one week from today. This information shall include a valid and functional email address as well as the mobile numbers of the respective Advocates.

¶22

f. The parties have agreed that the Sole Arbitrator shall

¶23

Page 2 of 3 8^th February 2024

¶24

9 AAR-10-2023.DOC

¶25

charge his fees as per the 4^th Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with the Bombay High Court (Fee payable to Arbitrators) Rules, 2018. The parties have further agreed that all the arbitral costs and the fees of the Arbitrator will be borne by the Applicant and the Respondent equally and will be subject to the final Award that may be passed by the Tribunal.

¶26

g. The parties immediately consent to a further extension of six months to complete the arbitration, should the learned Sole Arbitrator find it necessary.

¶27

h. The parties have agreed that the seat of the arbitration will be at Panaji, Goa. However, the venue of the Arbitration shall be decided by the Sole Arbitrator taking into consideration convenience of the parties as well as his convenience.

¶28

In view of above, Application stands disposed of.

¶29

Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order.

¶30

B. P. DESHPANDE, J

¶31

MEENA Digitally signed by MEENA VISHAL VISHAL BHOIR BHOIR Date: 2024.02.09 12:29:30 +05'30'

¶32

Page 3 of 3 8^th February 2024

Shradha Shipping Company Pvt. Ltd. Rep by Managing Director Chandrakant Gawas v. Ravindra Naidu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Shradha Shipping Company Pvt. Ltd. Rep by Managing Director Chandrakant Gawas v. Ravindra Naidu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prakash S/O Maroti Raut vs the Commissioner, Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Nagpur and Others

Deepak Gracias Vs Shaikh Ali Ahmed Member Secretary South Goa Planning and Development Authority

Antonio S. Palha Vs Amaldina Dias and 2 Ors.

Sunil S/O. Shriram Hatekar and Another vs Keshav S/O Krushnaji Joshi and Others

V.S. Products, Rep. by Prop., Manoj Kumar Srivastava Vs Additional Commissioner (Appeals), and Anr.

Viraj Manohar Bandekar Vs Lokmanya Multipurpose Co-Operative Society Ltd., Rep. by Manager Manisha Salgaokar