Disposed

Ramdas Dadabhau Dherange v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC15 Feb 2024/684/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant convicted under Section 353 IPC with two years' simple imprisonment sought suspension of sentence and bail pending appeal. Court noted prior custody, no misuse of earlier bail, short sentence and delay in appeal hearing, and suspended the sentence, releasing him on a personal recognizance bond.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended; applicant released on P.R. bond of Rs.15,000/- with one or more sureties in like amount, annual reporting to trial court required.

Ramdas Dadabhau Dherange Vs State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AS:7477

¶2

PMB 905.ia.684-24.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.684 OF 2024 IN

¶5

CRIMINAL APPEAL ST. NO.3496 OF 2024

¶6

RAMDAS DADABHAU DHERANGE ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT

¶7

Adv. Prashant P. Raul for the applicant. Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the State. PSI-Dongre, Shikrapur Police Station.

¶8

CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

¶9

DATE : FEBRUARY 15, 2024.

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State.

¶12

2. This is an application for suspension of sentence and bail. The trial Court by the impugned judgment and order convicted the applicant for the offence punishable under Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to suffer simple imprisonment for two years. The applicant during the pendency of the trial was in custody for 14 days. The appeal is unlikely to be heard soon.

1/3

PMB

905.ia.684-24.doc

3. The application for suspension of sentence and bail is opposed by learned APP.

¶17

4. The applicant was on bail during the trial. There is nothing on record to indicate that the applicant has misused his liberty while on bail. Considering the short sentence and as the appeal is not likely to be heard any time soon in near future, I am inclined to suspend the sentence and enlarge the applicant on bail. Hence, the following order :-

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

(a) The sentence is suspended.

¶20

(b) The applicant-Ramdas Dadabhau Dherange shall be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.15,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount.

¶21

(c) The applicant shall report to the trial Court once in a year, i.e. first Monday of the concerned month, between 11.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. commencing March 2024.

¶22

(d) On being released on bail, the applicant shall furnish his contact number and residential address to the Trial Court as well as the Investigating Officer and shall keep them updated, in case there is any change.

¶23

2/3

¶24

PMB 905.ia.684-24.doc

¶25

5. The interim application is disposed of in the above

¶26

terms.

¶27

(M. S. KARNIK, J.)

¶28

3/3

¶29

Signed by: Pradnya Bhogale Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 15/02/2024 15:01:07

Ramdas Dadabhau Dherange v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramdas Dadabhau Dherange v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Naik Vs the State of Maharashtra

Jaitunabi Bagwan Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Akshay Akash Nikalje Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Maharashtra Tank Lorry Owners vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Suyog Jaisingh Gurav Vs State of Maharashtra

Mulchand Changumal Jethwani and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra