Disposed

Parvati Rama Rasal v. the State of Maharashtra through Earthquake Rehabilitation Department and Others

Bombay HC8 Aug 2023WP/9619/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, disposed of a matter concerning an earthquake victim's claim for a plot. The court directed the concerned authority to verify the claim and decide within 60 days.

What did the court decide?

The petition is disposed of with a direction to Respondent No. 3 to consider the petitioner's record for a plot allotment and decide within 60 days.

Parvati Rama Rasal Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

9619.23wp

¶2

(1)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

47 WRIT PETITION NO.9619 OF 2023

¶5

PARVATI RAMA RASAL

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH EARTHQUAKE REHABILITATION DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS

¶8

Mr G. J. Kore, Advocate for Petitioner; Mr P. K. Lakhotiya, A.G.P. for Respondents/State

¶9

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND

¶10

Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

¶11

DATE : 8th August, 2023

¶12

PER COURT:

¶13

The Petitioner claims to be a sufferer of the

¶14

30/09/1993 earthquake with the epicenter in the Sastur and Killari areas. She was entitled to a plot in the light of the Government Resolution, which is neither pleaded nor placed on record. It is further contended that, she and her husband had two houses and, therefore, both of them were entitled to one house each.

¶15

The prayer clauses (B) and (C), put forth by the Petitioner, are as under :-

¶16

9619.23wp

¶17

(2)

¶18

“ B) To issue Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ in the like nature and the Respondent No. 2 may kindly be directed to allot plot No. 407 situated at village Kaldeo Nimbala Tq Omerga Dist. Osmanabad to the petitioner.

¶19

C) To issue writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions in the like nature the Respondent No. 2 may kindly be directed to consider the representation dated 19/11/2015, 07/12/2015 and 18/10/2022.”

¶20

Pursuant to the representation dated 19/11/2005, the Tahsildar, Omerga addressed the Deputy Collector (Rehabilitation), Osmanabad, vide communication dated 27/03/2017, suggesting that the request of the Petitioner could be considered for allotment of a plot. Thereafter, the Avval Karkun from the office of District Collector (Rehabilitation), Osmanabad, has addressed the Tahsildar, Omerga, by a communication dated 07/01/2019, asking for further details and a report. Copies are addressed to the Petitioner.

¶21

In view of the above, this petition is disposed off, with a direction to Respondent No.3, to consider the record of the Petitioner and after verifying as regards her right and claim for a plot in the backdrop of her deceased husband having already been granted another plot, a decision be arrived at within 60 days from

¶22

9619.23wp

¶23

(3)

¶24

today. The said decision shall be communicated to the Petitioner within two weeks, thereafter.

¶25

(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) sjk

Parvati Rama Rasal v. the State of Maharashtra through Earthquake Rehabilitation Department and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvati Rama Rasal v. the State of Maharashtra through Earthquake Rehabilitation Department and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhrupat Eknath Borkar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Rajendra Kishanlal Jaiswal Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Principal Secretary and Others

Bapurao Avadhut Badgujar and Others Vs the Governmnet of India and Others

Yogesh Vithalbhai Zaveri Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Omkar Digambarrao More Vs Sangita Omkar More

Concentrix Services India Pvt. Ltd. Formerly Known as Minacs Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Others