The petitioner in this writ petition, whose tenure as a Member of the District Committee had expired, sought to withdraw the matter on instructions provided to the advocate, leading to the disposal of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
2 wp 7892.23
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
2 WRIT PETITION NO.7892 OF 2023
RAJENDRA KISHANLAL JAISWAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Vikram Undre
AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. S.G. Karlekar
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE :7th August, 2023
P.C. :-
1.This matter was heard for some time. The tenure of the petitioner
as Member of the District Committee in the light of the order of granting him
membership on 28.02.2014, has already expired.
2.The learned advocate for the Petitioner sought a pass over to take
instructions.
3.When the matter was called out, the learned advocate for the
Petitioner submits on instructions that the Petitioner desires to withdraw this
petition.
4.In view of the above, the petition is disposed off as withdrawn on
instructions.
[RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.]
[Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.]
mub
RAJENDRA KISHANLAL JAISWAL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
Y.G. KHOBRAGADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court