The pending Writ Petition was disposed of based on an out-of-court settlement between the parties. The court recorded consent terms and accepted the undertakings filed by the parties.
The Writ Petition was disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms signed by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-AS:25732
901-wp-9140-22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9140 OF 2022
Satyabhushan T. Madan (since deceased through Legal Heirs & Anr) ...Petitioners Versus
Abhijit A. Subandh ...Respondent
Mr.Shyam Dewani and Mr. Chirag Chanani i/b Dewani & Associates for the Petitioners. Mr. Aditya Desai for the Respondent.
CORAM : N. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 5 SEPTEMBER 2023.
PC:-
(N. R. BORKAR,J.)
1/1
Dinesh S. Sherla
Satyabhushan T. Madan (Legal Heirs & Anr)
Abhijit A. Subandh
N. R. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court