A single judge allowed two interim applications filed in concurrent proceedings, directed the necessary amendment to be carried out within three weeks, and disposed of the applications.
Allowed the interim applications and directed necessary amendment to be carried out within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-AS:25762
9-IA-14866-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.14866 OF 2023
Govind Maruti Khot …Applicant Versus Mangal Appajoi Kadam ...Respondent
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. OF 17050 OF 2022 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.618 OF 2015
Shivaji Rao S. Hodage And Ors. ...Applicants Versus
Mangal Appaji Kadam And Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Naveeen B. Khaire for the Applicant/s. Mr. Ajay Raje Nimbalkar i/by Mr. Bhushan Mandlik for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATED : 5 SEPTEMBER 2023
P.C. :
For the reasons stated in the Interim Applications, the same
are allowed.
(N.R.BORKAR, J.)
Sayyed
1 / 1
Signed by: Sayyed Saeed Ali Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 05/09/2023 17:52:14
Govind Maruti Khot
Mangal Appajoi Kadam
Shivaji Rao S. Hodage And Ors.
Mangal Appaji Kadam And Ors.
N.R. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
