Galaxy Paper Industries through Its Partner Dr Nirmal Anandraj Jain Tatiya v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
911-wp8906.23
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8906 OF 2023
Galaxy Paper Industries, through its Partner
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
Respondents
Mr. Girish S. Rane, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P. S. Patil, Additional Government Pleader for Respondents No.1 to 3.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 24th AUGUST, 2023.
P.C. :
2. The petition, thus, stands dismissed as withdrawn
with the aforesaid liberty.
(ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
adb
Galaxy Paper Industries
The State of Maharashtra
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court