Dismissed
Venkat Santukrao Kulkarni v. the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Others
Bombay HCPIL/53/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 930PIL53.2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 53 OF 2023
Venkat s/o Santukrao Kulkarni
... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
... Respondents
Mr. Pratap K. Rodge – Advocate for the petitioner Mr. D. R. Kale – Government Pleader for State
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ AND ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATED : 24TH AUGUST, 2023
PER COURT : -
petitioner and Mr. D. R. Kale, learned Government Pleader for the State.
2 930PIL53.2023.odt
for the petitioner, Public Interest Litigation is disposed of as
having become infructuous.
[ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ] [ CHIEF JUSTICE ]
SG Punde
Venkat s/o Santukrao Kulkarni
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court