The application stands dismissed for want of prosecution as no party appeared for the applicants on the date of hearing despite adjournments and second call under caption 'for dismissal' (Para 14-15).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
901-revn-196.22.doc
BIPIN Digitally signed byBIPIN DHARMENDER DHARMENDER PRITHIANI PRITHIANI Date: 2023.10.1817:50:41 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 196 OF 2022
Naresh Shantaram Pawar & Ors. … Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
None for the Applicants. Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP for the Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM: R. N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 18 OCTOBER 2023
P.C. :-
. On 3 October 2023, none appeared for the applicants, the matter was adjourned to 16 October 2023. On 16 October 2023 also none present for the applicants and the matter was adjourned for today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also, even on second call, none appeared for the applicants.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
Naresh Shantaram Pawar & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
