This court disposed of the writ petition by recording the settlement reached between the parties, who submitted consent terms dated 4th September 2023.
Writ petition disposed of in terms of consent terms filed by parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
39 WP 8459.23.doc
Dusane
BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE
Digitally signed by BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Date: 2023.10.04 11:37:25 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8459 OF 2023
Uttam Baban Chikane & Anr.
…Petitioners
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra through …Respondents The Minister for Co-op. Department & Ors.
Mr. P.A. Pol a/w Mr. S.S. Suryawanshi i/by Pol Legal Juris for Petitioners.
Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP for State
Ms. Ashwini Dukare i/by H.G. Wakshe for Respondent Nos. 3 to 12.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATE: 3rd October 2023
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Pol, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners, Ms. Ashwini Dukare, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 3 to 12 and Mr. Sawant, learned AGP appearing for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
2. Learned Counsels appearing for the Petitioners and for the Respondent Nos. 3 to 12 state that the dispute between the parties is settled and tenders the consent terms. The
1/2
39 WP 8459.23.doc
consent terms dated 4th September 2023 is signed by the Petitioners and Respondent Nos. 3 to 12.
3. Both the parties are personally present in the Court. Respondent No. 3 is also personally present in the Court. She states that the Respondent Nos. 4 to 12 could not remain present in the Court, but they are also consenting for settlement of dispute in terms of the consent terms and accordingly signed the consent terms.
4. Both the respective learned Advocates appearing for the Petitioners as well as Respondent Nos. 3 to 12 identifies the signatures of the respective parties. The consent terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the consent terms with no order as to costs.
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)
2/2
Uttam Baban Chikane & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
The Minister for Co-op. Department & Ors.
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
