The High Court at Bombay allowed withdrawal of a writ petition concerning service discrepancy in railway service books on the availability of alternate remedies, dismissing the matter without deciding merits.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed with liberty to avail alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
52-wp-12145-2023.doc
Sonali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.12145 OF 2023
Sanjay Pitambar Nikam...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Vaibhav V. Ugle, for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. P. Vanarase, AGP, for the State/Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4.
Ms. Manjiri Parasnik, for Respondent No.2-Bank.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 3rd OCTOBER 2023
P.C.:
1. In view of availability of alternate remedy, Mr. Vaibhav Ugle, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks withdrawal of the
Writ Petition.
2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and
dismissed as such with liberty to avail the alternate remedy.3. It is clarified that contentions of all the contesting parties on
merits are expressly kept open.
1/1
Sanjay Pitambar Nikam
The State of Maharashtra
MADHAV J. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court