This court dismissed a writ petition where parties had reached a consensus regarding property partition. The petitioner was to retain the southern part of the property. The consent terms were to be preferred before the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
47-wp-721-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.721 OF 2023
NANDU RAMA KAPSE
VERSUS
MAYUR NAMDEO KAPSE AND ANOTHER
Mr. Sudheer R. Zambare, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. D. P. Palodkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATED : 13th FEBRUARY, 2023.
PER COURT:-
(SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH) JUDGE
Devendra/February-2023
Nandu Rama Kapse
Mayur Namdeo Kapse
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court