Writ petition regarding maintainability under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was permitted to be withdrawn subject to liberty to avail alternate remedy.
Writ petition permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to avail alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 1536.23
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1536 OF 2023
Nemichand Kesharlal Kasliwal and another
.. Petitioners
Versus
Tanzeem Shakil Ahmed Siddiqui .. Respondent
Shri B. L. Sagar Killarikar, Advocate h/f Shri Akash R. Ingle, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri Namit S. Muthiyan, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY, 2023.
FINAL ORDER :
. Upon a query that is put as regards maintainability of the writ petition in view of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy.
[SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]
bsb/Feb. 23
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nemichand Kesharlal Kasliwal
Nemichand Kesharlal Kasliwal
Tanzeem Shakil Ahmed Siddiqui
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
