This is a case summarily dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of the appellant/petitioner in an appeal, civil application, and writ petitions. The court observed that the party had lost interest in prosecuting the matters.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k 1/1 44 AO 663 of 18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.663 OF 2018
WITH CAA/873/2018 IN AO/663/2018 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.13221 OF 2018 WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.6592 OF 2018
Omkar Karbhari Aaher … Appellant/Petitioner
Versus
Shri Ashokkumar Mohanlal Shah and Ors. … Respondents
None for Appellant/Applicant/Petitioner in AO, CAA and WPs. Ms. Smita Gaidhani, for Respondent No.1 in AO, CAA and WPs.
… CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 29 NOVEMBER 2023.
P. C.:
. None for the Appellant/Applicant/Petitioner. Even on the last occasion on 31 October 2023 none had appeared on behalf of the Appellant/Applicant/Petitioner. It appears that the Appellant/Applicant/ Petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the Appeal, Interim Application and the Writ Petitions. The Appeal, Interim Application and Writ Petitions are therefore dismissed for default.
2 In view of the disposal of the Appeal from Order, the Civil Application is also disposed of accordingly.
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Omkar Karbhari Aaher
Shri Ashokkumar Mohanlal Shah
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
