The interim application was disposed of as it did not survive the disposal of the main appeal. No substantive ruling was made on the merits of the underlying matter.
The interim application was disposed of as it did not survive the disposal of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k 1/1 22 caa 317.19 in ao 268.19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 317 OF 2019 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.268 OF 2019
Sakuntala Gurusharan Barai and Anr. … Appellants/Applicants Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai And Ors. … Respondents
Mr. P.J. Thorat, with Mr. J.S. Yadav i/b Mr. Bholaprasad Shukla for Appellants/Applicants.
Mr. Dharmesh Vyas with Ms. Smita V. Tondwalkar, for Respondent No.1-MCGM.
Mr. Prakash Mhatre, Sub Engineer for MCGM present in Court.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 29 NOVEMBER 2023.
P. C.:
In view of the disposal of the Appeal from Order, the Interim Application does not survive and the same is disposed of accordingly.
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Sakuntala Gurusharan Barai and Anr.
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai And Ors.
SANDEEP V. MARNE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
