Allowed

Baba S/O Parasram Shambharkar v. State of Mah. Thr P.So. Ps Sitabuldi Nagpur

Bombay HC13 Mar 2023APPR/45/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed applications seeking condonation of delay and leave to continue a revision application filed by the widow of a deceased applicant under Section 394(2) of the CrPC. The widow sought to continue the appeal to establish her right to pension.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 574 days filed under Section 394(2) of CrPC was condoned and the applicant was allowed to continue the revision application.

Baba S/O Parasram Shambharkar Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

52 cr revn 75.19.odt..odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 75 OF 2019

¶5

Baba s/o Parasram Shambharkar and another

¶6

.Vs.

¶7

State of Maharashtra, through PSO PS, Sitabuldi, Nagpur

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

¶9

and Registrar's Orders.

¶10

Shri Shashibhushan Wahane, Advocate for the applicants. Ms M.H. Deshmukh, APP for the State.

¶11

CORAM : G.A. SANAP, J. DATE : 13/03/2023

¶12

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.330 OF 2023

¶13

Heard.

¶14

The original applicant No.2 Narendra Dandekar died on 24.04.2021. He was convicted and sentenced on various counts. The order of his conviction by the Magistrate was confirmed in appeal. However, the conviction and sentence on some counts was set aside. The applicant is his widow. This application is made for condonation of 574 days delay caused in filing an application under Section 394 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is stated that after death of applicant No.2, she is interested to continue the application in as much as the issue of her entitlement to get the pension after the death of the applicant No.2 survives. It is stated that

¶15

2 52 cr revn 75.19.odt..odt

¶16

she was not aware of legal niceties and therefore, the application could not be made within a period of one month. It is therefore, prayed that delay of 574 days caused in filing the application may be condoned.

¶17

Learned APP submits that considering the facts State has no objection to this application.

¶18

In view of this, the application is allowed. The delay caused in filing the application under Section 394(2) of Cr.P.C. is condoned.

¶19

The application is disposed of accordingly.

¶20

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.45/2023

¶21

Heard.

¶22

This is an application made under Section 394(2) of the Cr.P.C. by the widow of accused/applicant No.2, who has been convicted and sentenced on various counts. His appeal filed against the order of conviction and sentence by the learned Magistrate, was confirmed by the Sessions Court. However, the conviction and sentence on some of the counts has been maintained. It is stated that the deceased applicant No.2 with the applicant No.1 have questioned the legality and correctness of the said order.

¶23

52 cr revn 75.19.odt..odt

¶24

¶25

It is stated that the applicant No.2 died on 24/04/2021. The applicant who is widow of the applicant No.2, is entitled to get the pension. It is submitted that in order to clear the stigma and establish her right to get the pension, after demise of the applicant No.2, it is necessary to allow her to continue the application.

¶26

Learned APP submits that considering the facts and circumstances of the case, Court may pass an appropriate order.

¶27

It is seen that after the death of applicant No.2 the revision application has abated. The question is whether after the death of applicant No.2 his wife can be granted leave to continue the application. In the application, the widow of deceased applicant No.2 has stated the reasons. In view of the reasons, I am of the view that the application deserves to be allowed.

¶28

The application is allowed.

¶29

The applicant is allowed to continue the revision application which was filed by the deceased applicant No.2.

¶30

The application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶31

52 cr revn 75.19.odt..odt

¶32

¶33

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.385/2022

¶34

Heard.

¶35

Considering the facts stated in the application, the application for early hearing is granted. Criminal Revision No.75/2019 be listed for final hearing after four weeks. Advocate appearing for the applicant shall file a composite paper book containing the evidence and relevant documents.

¶36

Copy of the paper book be supplied to the learned APP well in advance.

¶37

The Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶38

(G. A. SANAP, J.)

¶39

manisha

¶40

Signed By:MANISHA ALOK SHEWALE

¶41

Signing Date:15.03.2023 17:20

Baba S/O Parasram Shambharkar v. State of Mah. Thr P.So. Ps Sitabuldi Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baba S/O Parasram Shambharkar v. State of Mah. Thr P.So. Ps Sitabuldi Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madanaiah Durgam Chinna Kande Vs Kande Omkar Kande Madanaiah, Minor Thr. His Natural Guardian Mother Sandhya Rani Madanaiah Kande

Mukund S/O Manohar Wazalwar Vs Eknath S/O Bajirao Hatwar

Rizwan Ahmad Abbas Vs Saida Parveen W/O Rizwan Ahmad Abbas and Another

Baba S/O Parasram Shambharkar Vs State of Mah. Thr P.So. Ps Sitabuldi Nagpur

Amol Vishnupant Bijawe Vs Samrudhi Amol Bijwe Thr. Mother Pallavi @ Yogeshwari Punjabrao Gulhane

Sharda W/O Ganeshrao Pawar @ Sharda D/O Vasantrao Kadam and 2 Others Vs Kishor S/O Sopanrao Shilwant