Corporation was also positive to consider the case of the Petitioners. The Petitioners have also secured full 100 marks. They cannot be discriminated. It would be injustice upon the Petitioners if they are not given appointment orders though they have got full 100 marks and the posts are vacant. The learned Counsel further submits that some of the Petitioners had filed Writ Petition (L) No.3326 of 2017, Writ Petition (L) No.50 of 2018, Writ Petition (L) No.3418 of 2017, Writ Petition (L) No.57 of 2018 and Writ Petition No.2967 of 2016 challenging the fresh advertisements issued, so also seeking relief of grant of employment based on the selection of the year 2009. The Division Bench of this Court, under order dated 18th June 2018, accepted the motion of the Petitioners for withdrawal of the petitions with liberty to approach the Commissioner / Competent Authority of the Municipal Corporation for redressal of their grievance in the light of the resolution passed on 20th May 2013 in the joint meeting of the Corporation. The Court directed that if such representation is made, it may be decided expeditiously. Pursuant thereto a decision was taken by the Commissioner rejecting the representation. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the representation is rejected without affording opportunity of hearing to the Petitioners. The Respondents be directed to hear the Petitioners and decide the representation, afresh.
