The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition as abatement since the sole petitioner had died more than two years prior to the hearing. The petition was disposed of without engaging substantive issues.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
914.wp.5646.2008.doc
Chaitali Ekke
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5646 OF 2008
Anna Shankar Pol …Petitioner Versus The Superintendent of Land Records, Satara and Ors. …Respondents
Mr. Sharad Bhosale i/b Mr. Dilip Bodake, Advocate for Petitioner. Ms. Smita Gaidhani, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 to 9. Ms. Vaishali Nimbalkar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 3rd April 2023
P.C.:
1 Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 to 9, states that Petitioner
has died, more than 2 years back. Advocate Mr. Bhosale holding for Advocate Mr. Bodake for the deceased Petitioner states that he will take steps in the matter.
2 As the Sole Petitioner is died the matter is abated. Hence, Writ Petition disposed off as abated.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
1
Anna Shankar Pol
The Superintendent of Land Records, Satara and Ors.
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
