The High Court allowed a civil application for restoring a first appeal dismissed for failure to serve unserved respondents. The court permitted the appellant to file documents and serve them within four weeks.
Civil application allowed; appellant permitted to file documents and serve the other side within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 215 OF 2020 IN
REJECTED CASE NO. 2017 OF 2017
The General Manager Best Undertaking ...Petitioner Versus
Mrs. Sayamma Yellappa Kallemul And Ors. ...Respondents
Hemal i/b. Navdeep Vora Associates for appellant.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J
DATED: 20th March, 2023
PC:-
conditional order. Advocate for the appellants state that he had already filed civil application no. 300 of 2019 for praying therein to allow to serve the unserve respondent nos. 4 and 5 by paper publication.
(RAJESH S. PATIL,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil application for restoration of a dismissed first appeal due to failure to serve unserved respondents should be allowed.
The General Manager Best Undertaking
Mrs. Sayamma Yellappa Kallemul And Ors.
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
