Disposed

Sumit Chandrakant Kale v. Pravin Ramchandra Naiknaware and Ors.

Bombay HC6 Nov 2023WP/5630/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking interference in an interim order of the School Tribunal. The Court directed the Tribunal to decide the pending appeal expeditiously and clarified that it had not considered the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Directible the School Tribunal to dispose of pending Appeal No. 13 of 2022 on or before 31 December 2023.

Sumit Chandrakant Kale Vs Pravin Ramchandra… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

28 WP 5630.23.doc

¶2

Dusane

¶3

BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE

¶4

Digitally signed by BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Date: 2023.11.07 17:35:09 +0530

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.5630 OF 2023

¶7

Sumit Chandrakant Kale

¶8

…Petitioner

¶9

V/s.

¶10

Pravin Ramchandra Naiknaware …Respondents & Ors.

¶11

Mr. Ashutosh M. Kulkarni i/by Mr. Akshay Kulkarni for Petitioner.

¶12

Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar, Senior Counsela a/w Mr. Vinayak Kumbhar i/by A.N. Bandiwadekar for Respondent No.1.

¶13

Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP for State- Respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

¶14

CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE: 6th November 2023

¶15

P.C.:

¶16

1. Heard Mr. Kulkarni learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 and Mr. Sawant, learned AGP for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5-State.

¶17

2. The impugned order in the present Writ Petition is dated 9^th December 2022 passed by the learned School Tribunal, Solapur below Exhibit 5 in Appeal No. 13 of 2022. As the said interim 1/2

¶18

28 WP 5630.23.doc

¶19

order is in operation for about 11 months, Mr. Kulkarni, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that the said Appeal No. 13 of 2022 pending before the learned School Tribunal, Solapur be directed to be disposed of expeditiously. He states that the Appellant has concluded his arguments and the matter is kept for arguments of the Petitioner-Management on 9th November 2023. Accordingly, interference in the impugned order dated 9th December 2022 is not warranted. It is clarified that as the impugned order is only an interim order, the said Appeal be disposed of without being influenced by the observations made in the said order.

¶20

3. The learned Presiding Officer, School Tribunal is requested to dispose of Appeal No.13 of 2022 on or before 31st December 2023.

¶21

4. It is further clarified that this Court has not considered the merits of the matter and all contentions of the parties are kept open.

¶22

5. The Writ Petition is disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs.

¶23

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)

¶24

2/2

Sumit Chandrakant Kale v. Pravin Ramchandra Naiknaware and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumit Chandrakant Kale v. Pravin Ramchandra Naiknaware and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjeeva Shetty Vs the Commisioner of Police , Thane (City) District-Thane and Anr.

Oam Industries India Pvt. Ltd. through Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

The Dinanath Co-Op Hou. Soc. Ltd. Vs Itus a - Wing Dinanath Co-Op Hou. and Ors.

Mahant Ramsnehisad Guru Narayandas Vs Vedprakash Udayraj Pande

Shri. Shrirang Nivritti Devkate and Ors. Vs the Additional Collector, Pune and Ors.

Sou. Ujwala Ramrao Kawar Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Collector, Nashik and Ors.