This single judge order dismisses a writ petition challenging an order by the Assistant Charity Commissioner. The court held that interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was not warranted in the present circumstances.
Writ Petition dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
37-WP-13750-2023.doc
Arjun
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.13750 OF 2023
Mahant Ramsnehidas Guru Naryandas …Petitioner
V/s.
Vedprakash Udayraj Pande …Respondent
Mr. Parikshit Mantri i/b Mr. Parag V. Barde, for the Petitioner (Through V. C.).
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 06, 2023
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Mantri, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner.
2. By the present Writ Petition, the challenge is to the legality and validity of the order dated 3rd February 2023 passed by the learned Assistant Charity Commissioner in Application at Exh.37 in Enquiry No.393 of 2022. The relief sought in the Application at Exh.37 is that the voice sample of the contesting parties be sent to the Deputy Director, Regional Forensic Science Laboratory. The Assistant Charity Commissioner, by the order dated 3rd February 2023 directed that the said Application would be decided at the time of fnal argument.
3. In view of the nature of the impugned order, interference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not warranted.
1
37-WP-13750-2023.doc
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, however, with no order as to costs.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Article 227 of the Constitution of India is warranted for interference in the order passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner.
Whether the Writ Petition challenging the Assistant Charity Commissioner's order should be dismissed.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahant Ramsnehidas Guru Naryandas
Vedprakash Udayraj Pande
MADHAV J. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
