In a writ petition, the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition, which was granted. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-WP.5374.2022
jvs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SALUNKE J V
WRIT PETITION NO. 5374 OF 2022
Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2023.02.13 11:17:56 +0530
Thermo Fisher Scientific India } Private Limited } Petitioner versus Municipal Corporation of Greater } Mumbai & Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Darshit Jain i/b. TMT Law Practice for the petitioner.
Ms. Rupali Adhate for MCGM.
Mr. Ameya Kulkarni i/b. Mr. Jidnyesh Joshi for respondent no. 7.
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, Act.CJ.& SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2023
P.C.:
1. The learned advocate for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Leave granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
(ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Thermo Fisher Scientific India Private Limited
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
S. V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
