Petitioners sought withdrawal of property attachment. Court found attached property revocation already ordered, served purpose, and dismissed petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5-WP-417-2023
Pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT
Digitally signed byPRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2023.02.10 10:26:06 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 417 OF 2023
Makarand Rajadhyaksha & Anr. .. Petitioners
Versus
Employees’ Provident Fund Organization & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Ram Upadhyay for petitioners.
Mr. Vinay Kate a/w Gunjan Chaubey for respondents.
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, ACTING CJ. &
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 2023
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. The present writ petition is filed seeking direction against the respondent no.1 to withdraw the attachment to the property of the Society.
3. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that on 3rd February, 2023 the order is already passed revoking the order dated 27th December, 2017, attaching the property of the petitioners.
4. In view of that now the purpose of the writ petition stands served. The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Makarand Rajadhyaksha & Anr.
Employees' Provident Fund Organization & Anr.
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
SANDEEP V. MARNE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court