Dismissed

Kisanrao Barku Kharat v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC2 May 2023WP/5239/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of multiple writ petitions concerning land acquisition. Finding that the acquisition proposal had been submitted to the Collector, the Court held the claims prima facie redressed. Objections regarding the award were kept open.

What did the court decide?

All petitions stood disposed of. All objections intended by petitioners in respect of the award are kept open.

Kisanrao Barku Kharat Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

2 WRIT PETITION NO.10596 OF 2021

¶4

WITH WP/5310/2022 WITH WP/5239/2022 WITH WP/10625/2021
WITH WP/10623/2021 WITH WP/10610/2021 WITH
WP/10609/2021 WITH WP/10617/2021 WITH WP/10611/2021

¶5

RAMSING GOTURAM KUDALE

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶8

Advocate for Petitioners : Mrs. Mangal R. Chavan
AGP for Respondent – State : Mr. S.G. Sangle

¶9

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND

¶10

S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.

¶11

DATE : 02-05-2023

¶12

PER COURT :

¶13

.In view of reply submitted by the respondents
particularly the respondent no.5 thereby stating that the proposal for
acquisition of the land of the petitioners is submitted before the
Collector, the claim put forth by the petitioners prima facie appears to
be redressed. All the petitions accordingly stand disposed of.

¶14

2.All the objections which the petitioners intend to have in

¶15

the matter of the award to be passed under the Act of 2013, are kept
open.

¶16

( S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ) ( NITIN W. SAMBRE , J. )

¶17

GGP

Kisanrao Barku Kharat v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kisanrao Barku Kharat v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahatma Phule Multi Services Parbhani through Proprietor Jaykumar Nagorao Kale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Tukaram Kishan Madrewar and Another Vs the Union of India through Its Secretary and Others

Aditya Electricals and Contractors through Its Proprietor Mukesh Hirachand Hembade Vs the Chief Engineer and Another

Shrushti Springs and Components through Its Partners Somnath Ramdas Pable and Another Vs the Commissioner State GST Bhavan and Others

Sumitrabai Kisan Kharat Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bna Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. through Its Authorized Signatory as Director Ashwin Suresh Agrawal Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others