A writ petition challenging a GST registration cancellation was dismissed as impossible, because the petitioner had already received a communication revoking that cancellation before the judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
50 WRIT PETITION NO.1577 OF 2023
SHRUSHTI SPRINGS AND COMPONENTS
THROUGH ITS PARTNERS SOMNATH RAMDAS PABLE AND
ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE COMMISSIONER STATE GST BHAVAN AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Ajeet B. Kale
AGP for Respondent – State : Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND
S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.
DATE : 02-05-2023
PER COURT :
th
.The communication dated 25 April, 2023 issued by the
State Tax Officer thereby revoking the cancellation of the registration,
is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
2.In view of the aforesaid communication, the petition is
disposed of as having been rendered infrcutuous.
( S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. )
( NITIN W. SAMBRE , J. )
GGP
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shrushti Springs and Components
The Commissioner State GST Bhavan and Others
Nitin W. Sambre
S.G. Chapalgaonkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court