Disposed

Uttam Vishwanath Surwase and Others v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Bombay HC9 Aug 2023WP/5219/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition directing the respondents to consider the petitioners' applications and representations within sixty days while adhering to legal provisions and due procedure.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondents to deal with representations within sixty days following due procedure and provisions of law.

Uttam Vishwanath Surwase and Others Vs the State of… — RTI and Transparency | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

7-WP-5219-2023.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.5219 OF 2023

¶4

UTTAM VISHWANATH SURWASE AND OTHERS

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND
OTHERS

¶7

Mr. S. L. Bhapkar, Advocate for Petitioners
Mr. S. B. Yawalkar, AGP for Respondents - State

¶8

CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

¶9

DATE:09.08.2023

¶10

PER COURT :-

¶11

1. The Petitioners pray that their application dated

¶12

21.03.2022 and 02.05.2022, be considered and a decision be
taken on merits.

¶13

2.In view of the above, this petition is disposed off with
a direction to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to deal with the
representations of the Petitioners by following the due procedure
laid down and in accordance with the provisions of law, within
sixty (60) days from the date of appearance.

¶14

1 of 2

¶15

(( 2 ))7-WP-5219-2023

¶16

3.By consent of the parties, the Petitioners or their
representative or their legal representative would remain present
before Respondent No.3 on 30.08.2023 at 12.00 noon. Notices are,
therefore, dispensed with.

¶17

4.Needless to state, after the conclusion of the proceedings
and the order being passed within sixty (60) days from the date of
appearance, the decision/response of the authorities would be
conveyed to the representative of these Petitioners.

¶18

5.In the event, the Petitioners' grievances are not redressed,
they are at liberty to avail of a remedy as may be permissible in law.

¶19

[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ]

¶20

SMS

¶21

 2 of 2

Uttam Vishwanath Surwase and Others v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uttam Vishwanath Surwase and Others v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogesh Vithalbhai Zaveri Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Omkar Digambarrao More Vs Sangita Omkar More

Parvati Rama Rasal Vs the State of Maharashtra through Earthquake Rehabilitation Department and Others

Ranjana Sanjay Ujalambe and Others Vs the Additional Collector and Others

Chaya Pandurang Birajdar and Others Vs the Additional Collector and Others

Anuradha Shivaji Chavan and Others Vs the Additional Collector and Others