The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the criminal writ petition under leave. The petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
921 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.475 OF 2023
CHETAN ASHOK CHAUDHARI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr. Sanket N. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Petitioner
Mr. G.O. Wattamwar, APP for Respondent / State
Mr. V.D. Hon, Senior Advocate i/by. Mr. Ashwin V. Hon, Advocate for
Respondents No.2 & 3
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATE : OCTOBER 19, 2023
PER COURT :
.When this Court has shown disinclination to grant relief,
learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions seeks leave to
withdraw the petition.
2.Leave granted. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
[ R. M. JOSHI ]
JUDGE
1/1
GGP
CHETAN ASHOK CHAUDHARI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
R. M. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court