The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the criminal writ petition after the Court expressed disinclination to grant relief. Leave was granted, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition is laid down.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
920 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.429 OF 2023
SHIVRAJ NAGORAO DHULSHETE
VERSUS
SUMAN @ SUSHMA W/O. SHIVRAJ DHULSHETE AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Satej S. Jadhav
APP for Respondent / State : Mr. G.O. Wattamwar
Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. I.D. Maniyar
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATE : OCTOBER 19, 2023
PER COURT :
.After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner when this
Court has shown disinclination to grant relief, learned counsel for the
petitioner on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
2.Leave granted. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
[ R. M. JOSHI ]
JUDGE
1/1
GGP
SHIVRAJ NAGORAO DHULSHETE
SUMAN @ SUSHMA W/O. SHIVRAJ DHULSHETE
ANOTHER
R. M. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court