Disposed

Baligunissa Begum W/O. Mohd. Samiuddin Chaudhari v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC19 Apr 2023WP/460/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner approached the Divisional Police Complaint Authority regarding complaints against accused persons. Drinking to avoid independently granting relief, the Court kept the petitioner's grievance avenue open to the Authority and disposed of the writ petition without issuing any mandatory direction.

What the court decided

AI extract

Baligunissa Begum W/O. Mohd. Samiuddin Chaudhari Vs… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

 950-Cri.WP.460 of 2023.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.460 OF 2023

¶4

BALIGUNISSA BEGUM W/O. MOHD. SAMIUDDIN CHAUDHARI

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶7

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. M. S. Choudhary
APP for Respondent – State : Mr. G. O. Wattamwar

¶8

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND

¶9

ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, JJ.

¶10

DATED : 19 APRIL 2023

¶11

PER COURT :

¶12

. The Petitioner who has filed some applications with the

¶13

respondent no.4 Divisional Police Complaint Authority, is making following

¶14

prayers :-

¶15

“A] This Criminal writ petition may kindly be allowed.

¶16

B] Deleted as per Court order dated 30.03.2023.

¶17

C] Pending hearing and final disposal of this Criminal writ petition, the respondent no.2 may kindly be directed to provide at least some necessary staff to the respondent no.4 to unable the respondent no.4 for continuing its functioning temporarily.

¶18

D] The respondent no.5 may kindly be directed to conduct seizer panchanama of seizer of two boards in the name of accused persons and the same be removed from the land of petitioner Survey No.166/1 and the petitioner may be allowed to enjoy her property adm. 26 R. land of Survey No. 166/1 of Udgir as owner and possessor without any interference from the accused persons in Crime No. 251/2022 registered with Respondent no.5 Police Station.

¶19

1/2

¶20

 950-Cri.WP.460 of 2023.odt

¶21

E] Ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause “C” & “D” may kindly be granted.

¶22

E] Cost of the petition and compensatory cost be awarded to the petitioner by saddling the same upon the respondents.

¶23

G] Any other suitable relief to which the petitioner is found entitled may kindly be granted.”

¶24

2.In our considered view, when the petitioner is already before the
Divisional Police Complaint Authority – respondent no.4 with all allegations as
mentioned in her application/compliant No. 257 of 2022, no relief as is being
claimed can be granted independently.

¶25

3. Keeping open the avenue to the petitioner to put up her grievance before the Divisional Police Complaint Authority - respondent no.4, we dispose of the writ petition.

¶26

 (ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.)

¶27

 (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)

¶28

Tandale/-

¶29

2/2

Baligunissa Begum W/O. Mohd. Samiuddin Chaudhari v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Baligunissa Begum W/O. Mohd. Samiuddin Chaudhari v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Padmesh Jayanarayan Laddha and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Krashna Rajaram Hamde and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Appa Gajabapu Koradkar (C-342) Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Nikhil Hiraji Nikhil and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Kusum @ Bhima W/O. Sudam Thorat Vs the Investigation Officer, Cantonment Police Station, Aurangabad and Another

Vijay Ukharda Lad and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another